\documentclass[11pt]{article} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{0.0truein} \setlength{\evensidemargin}{0.0truein} \setlength{\textwidth}{6.5truein} \setlength{\topmargin}{0.0truein} \setlength{\textheight}{9.0truein} \setlength{\headsep}{0.0truein} \setlength{\headheight}{0.0truein} \setlength{\topskip}{10.0pt} \setlength{\parskip}{5mm} \usepackage{url} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{amssymb} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \begin{center} \textbf{\Large{\textsc{STANFORD UNIVERSITY}}}\\[5pt] \textbf{\Large{\textsc{DEPARTMENT OF STATISTICS}}}\\[5pt] \Large{\textsc{DEPARTMENTAL SEMINAR}} \end{center} % In the following statements, replace "Time of talk", % "Weekday", and "Date of talk". An example is provided. % If you are not sure about this, just skip this part. \begin{center} Example: 4:15 p.m., Tuesday, July 31, 2007\\ Sequoia Hall Room 200\\ (Cookies at 3:45 in 1st Floor Lounge) \end{center} % In the following statements, replace "Name of the speaker" with your % name, "Department Affiliation" with your department affiliation, and %"University Affiliation" with your university affiliation. \begin{center} \textsl{Kaspar Rufibach} \\ Department of Statistics\\ Stanford University \end{center} \begin{center} \subsection*{Max-–domain of attraction for log–-concave \\densities and smooth tail index estimation} \end{center} \noindent Both parametric distribution functions appearing in extreme value theory -- the generalized extreme value distribution and the generalized Pareto distribution -- have log--concave densities if the extreme value index $\gamma$ lies in $[-1,0]$. It is shown that all distribution functions $F$ having a log--concave density function belong to the max--domain of attraction of the generalized extreme value distribution. Given an i.i.d.~sample $X_1, \ldots, X_n$ where $X_i$ has a log--concave density $f$, the distribution function $\hat F_n$ derived from the log--concave NPMLE $\hat f_n$ is asymptotically equivalent to the empirical distribution function $\mathbb{F}_n$. Replacing the order statistics in tail index estimators by the quantiles of $\hat F_n$ leads to ``smoothed'' estimators of $\gamma$. Monte Carlo simulations suggest that for finite $n$ these new estimators are highly accurate and well superior to their non--smoothed counterparts. If time permits, we discuss some problems in deriving asymptotical results. Based on joint work with Samuel M\"uller, University of Western Australia. \end{document}