\documentclass[11pt]{article} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{0.0truein} \setlength{\evensidemargin}{0.0truein} \setlength{\textwidth}{6.5truein} \setlength{\topmargin}{0.0truein} \setlength{\textheight}{9.0truein} \setlength{\headsep}{0.0truein} \setlength{\headheight}{0.0truein} \setlength{\topskip}{10.0pt} \setlength{\parskip}{5mm} \usepackage{url} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{amssymb} \begin{document} \begin{center} \textbf{\textsc{STANFORD UNIVERSITY}}\\[5pt] \textbf{\textsc{DEPARTMENT OF STATISTICS}}\\[5pt] \Large{\textbf\textsc{{DEPARTMENTAL SEMINAR}}} \end{center} \begin{center} 4:15 p.m., Tuesday, November 21, 2006\\ Sequoia Hall Room 200\\ (Cookies at 3:45 in 1st Floor Lounge) \end{center} \begin{center} \textsl{Bin Yu} \\ Department of Statistics\\ University of California, Berkeley \end{center} \begin{center} \textbf{ Arctic Cloud Detection using Multi-Angle and Hyperspectral Satellite Images} \end{center} \noindent Sensitivity of Earth's climate to increasing amounts of atmospheric carbon dioxide is a topic of general and scientific interest and public policy. Today's global climate models predict that the strongest dependences of surface temperatures on increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide levels will occur in the Arctic. Ascertaining the properties of clouds in the Arctic via conventional satelliate images is a challenging problem because liquid and ice water cloud particles often have similar properties to the snow and ice particles that compose snow- and ice-covered surfaces. Without accurate characterization of clouds over the Arctic we will not be able to assess the impact of clouds on the flow of solar and terrestrial electromagnetic radiation through the Arctic atmosphere and we will not be able to ascertain whether they are changing in ways that enhance or ameliorate future warming in the Arctic. With the launch of the Multi-angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer (MISR) and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MODIS) by NASA in 1999, novel electromagnetic radiation measurements made at many angles (from MISR) and across many narrow wavelength (hyperspectral) regions in the visible and infrared (by MODIS) became available for scientific study. In this talk, we report on an on-going collaborative effort since 2001 to devise online and effective arctic cloud detection algorithms based on both MISR and MODIS measurements. After much interaction with the MISR team at JPL, we have arrived at three physically meaningful features from MISR for our clustering algorithm, Enhanced Linear Correlation Matching Clustering (ELCMC). This algorithm thresholds the three features with two fixed thresholds and one adaptive threshold which is found by an EM algorithm. It is robust and computationally fast for online processing of MISR images. Further improvements over ELCMC are achieved by using concensus lables of ELCMC-MISR and MODIS to train Fisher's Quadratic Discriminat Analysis (QDA) to provide soft labels. Support vector machines (SVMs) can obtain better accuracies when compared with expert labels for some images than QDA, but they are much slower than QDA. Binning is then applied to the features before SVMs to speed up the SVM computation substantially with comparable cloud detection results. The cloud labels from different algorithms are compared with the best "ground truth" available in large quantities -- the expert labels. QDA based on the consensus labels from MISR-ELCMC and MODIS achieves a 94% accuracy and a 100% coverage (i.e. percentage of labeled pixels), compared with the 80% accuracy and 26% coverage from the MISR operational algorithm. Since two expert labels could differ by around 5%, we have come close to automating the expert labeling process. (This talk is based on joint work with Tao Shi at Ohio State University, Eugene Clothiaux at Penn State University, and Amy Braverman at NASA's Jet Propulsion Lab.) \end{document}