Next: Conclusion
Up: Data Analysis Supplement
Previous: Box-Cox Transformation
Standard parametric confidence intervals can provide a measure of
significance for regression coefficients. Yet they require acceptance
of Gaussian assumptions regarding estimates of coefficients for their
validity. Diagnostic analysis did not support these assumptions,
especially given the limited data available to estimate the
variability from the multitude of sources. Alternatives to the
standard parametric confidence intervals are the semiparametric or
nonparametric methods using bootstrap estimates of the variability of
the coefficient estimates [4,3]. Our analysis used nonparametric
bootstrap percentile confidence intervals to infer the observed
significance level of the effects. The multiple linear regression was
performed with 1000 bootstrap replications, by fixing the design
matrix and resampling from the possible responses conditional on each
treatment combination. The bootstrap distribution of each regression
coefficient was compiled, and the 5th and 95th percentiles of the
empirical distribution formed the limits for the 95% bootstrap
percentile confidence interval. Plots for the effects of interest are
included below. If the confidence
interval failed to include 0, then the p-value was deemed to be less
than or equal to 0.05, and the effect was said to be significant.
Figure 5 shows the 95% percentile intervals for the interactions
terms of interest.
Figure 5:
Nonparametric bootstrap intervals
![\includegraphics [angle=270,scale=.5]{intervals.epsi}](img21.png) |
Next: Conclusion
Up: Data Analysis Supplement
Previous: Box-Cox Transformation
regina@stat.stanford.edu